Affirmative Action Would Best Fit Into Which Political Philosophy

By Ra_Frances712 24 Apr, 2022 Post a Comment

Justify affirmative action programs. For this course my question for.

Prri

Ariadnes Thread is concerned with arguments related to politically significant ethical issues like abortion.

. Students discuss the pros and cons of affirmative action and discuss some controversial court cases. Two decades into the active revival of liberal political philosophy a revival that can be dated from the publication of John Rawls A Theory of Justice in 19711 Michel Rosenfeld2 offers an ambitious ac- count of why all the rival approaches are defective and why a proposal of his own built around a combination of theories from Lawrence. Libertarian contractarian utilitarian and egalitarian.

Its not necessarily the case that affirmative action meant to address past or present disadvantages. A direct popular vote on a proposed law or constitutional amendment. The arguments are mainly ethical rather than legal or political.

Rosenfeld begins by discussing the treatment of affirmative action under each of the four major philosophical conceptions of equality consistent with the tenets of liberal political philosophy. The Good Citizen Lecture 18 19 Lectures 19 20. Affirmative action has troubled the American political landscape for over three decades.

In its latter form it has tended to focus on actual results. Strong affirmative action is when an employercompany sets a goals to hire a certain percentage of minoritieswomen as long as they meet minimal requirements when a caucasian male and a minority woman or another race are both going for the same position and the white male is more qualified for the position even though they both meet minimal. Elites sometimes see affirmative action as a moral undertaking but the preferences rarely threaten their status.

The dilemmas themselves indeed seem acute. Affirmative action in hiring or higher education is not going to do anything so stop the alienation of the worker nor resolve class conflict it just may change the demographics racial or socioeconomic of the capitalist class. The new system would separate the population into several distinct.

Originally it was designed to ensure that employees and applicants for jobs with government contractors did not suffer discrimination. It is true for example that US. If Affirmative Action policy were to be redirected from focusing on race ethnicity gender etc and instead focused on socioeconomic status those who are intended to receive the benefits from affirmative action would receive the focus without alienating other equally disadvantaged groups.

Even if Nagel is wrong. He then examines systematically the Supreme Courts rulings on affirmative action in light of evolving conceptions of the. When the phrase was first coined it was in the context of an executive order requiring federal employers to take affirmative action in hiring minorities to promote equality by race religion.

Within a year however affirmative action was used to refer to policies aimed at compensating African-Americans for unjust racial discrimination and at improving. For all of these reasons affirmative action programs remain controversial in the countries that have adopted them. Affirmative Action Lecture 17 The Violin.

And the highest political offices should go to those with the best judgment and the greatest civic virtue. At the core of affirmative action is the decision that a human beings value is not necessarily rooted in hisher contribution skills value to society merit or any other attribute that can be changed but on their race. 37 Full PDFs related to this paper.

New Directions for Student Services 1990. This view like Tims is just way too simplistic. In its earliest form affirmative action was more e focused on fair and open processes and making sure that they are not infected with bias.

Affirmative action known as positive discrimination in the UK and as employment equity in Canada and elsewhere refers to policies that take factors including race color religion sex or national origin into consideration in order to benefit an underrepresented group in are. Its certainly harder to justify. It is actually often used as an argument against affirmative action because affirmative action explicitly does not target economic status.

Despite the shallow rhetoric you often hear in the media the issues involved in affirmative action are both philosophically complex and of great social and political importance. What you present isnt an argument for affirmative action. Download Full PDF Package.

The purpose of this site is not to promote any particular answer to any particular question. A policy or program providing advantages for people of a minority group with the aim of creating a more racially equal society through preferential access to education employment health care social welfare etc. Should go to the best flute players.

The complexity arises from its association with the concept of justice and its importance stems from its fundamental influence upon social and political institutions. Sooner or later every ethicist must confront the dilemmas it and a variety of closely related policiesmulticultural education diversity management sensitivity training sessionspose. Its this more recent approach to affirmative action I think that causes all the political and emotional turmoil over affirmative action.

Rather its purpose is first of all to introduce concepts claims and arguments that are part of modern moral philosophy. Further they see these programs as useful symbolic policies adding to social stability or as marketing tools to obtain votes or to sell products. A court may justifiably ignore Nagels critique for another more fundamental reason-the merit argument itself is irrelevant to the fairness of affirmative action programs.

The term affirmative action originated in the USA under President Kennedy. Affirmative action means positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in areas of employment education and culture from which they have been historically excluded. Definitions and philosophy.

A short summary of this paper. That is Nagels analysis is rather beside the point for the objection to affirmative action that it critiques is beside the point. When those steps involve preferential selectionselection on the basis of race gender or ethnicityaffirmative action.

However if you want some support for your argument you should read On the Jewish Question There he criticizes something like identity politics for.

The Model Minority Is Losing Patience The Economist